How do companies recycle aluminum?
Aluminum is generally combined with other metals to improve its properties. These aluminum alloys are divided into families according to the filler metals. The compositions must comply with recognized standards in order to guarantee the specific properties of each alloy.
Manufacturing companies (e.g., aircraft, automotive and appliance makers) use a number of alloys in their products and recycle scrap, machining chips and defective components. Re-melting together scrap of different compositions would produce an alloy that doesn’t meet any standard. This is why it becomes necessary to sort them properly so as not to mix them. Normally these companies will sort the scrap metal at the production plant so that it’s not devalued by the recycler. Otherwise, the recycler will have to carry out this sorting on their own. The sorted waste is then crushed and decontaminated to remove any pollutants (e.g., varnish, paint, oil).
The final step is the fusion of this sorted and packaged waste to produce ingots corresponding to the original composition, known as “second fusion” ingots. When the composition of these ingots corresponds to that of a foundry alloy, they are then sold to foundries to make new parts. They can also be re-melted like the alloys produced in the casting centers of aluminum smelters to produce rolling ingots or extrusion billets.
Is it true that aluminum causes Alzheimer’s?
This hypothesis has occasionally attracted attention, however it isn’t supported by public health protection agencies and related associations. In particular, the World Health Organization (WHO) reports the following:
There is little indication that orally ingested aluminum is acutely toxic to humans despite the widespread occurrence of the element in foods, drinking water and many antacid preparations. It has been hypothesized that aluminum exposure is a risk factor for the development or acceleration of onset of Alzheimer disease (AD) in humans. The 1997 WHO EHC document for aluminum concludes that: On the whole, the positive relationship between aluminum in drinking water and AD, which was demonstrated in several epidemiological studies, cannot be totally dismissed. However, strong reservations about inferring a causal relationship are warranted in view of the failure of these studies to account for demonstrated confounding factors and for total aluminum intake from all sources.
According to the Alzheimer Society of Canada, after noting that for more than 40 years researchers have studied the potential links between aluminum and cognitive impairment, it summarizes its position by stating that current research offers no convincing evidence of a link between aluminum exposure and the development of cognitive impairment.
Is aluminum harmful to human health?
Aluminum is the third element of the Earth’s crust and its most abundant metal. Various organizations have studied the supposed effects of aluminum exposure on human health, including government public health agencies, associations and industry companies concerned about the topic.
From the sources below, it’s important to remember the following:
- Aluminium is present in many consumer products, such as antacids, buffered aspirin, antiperspirants, cosmetics and food additives.
- In the United States an adult eats 7 to 9 mg of aluminum per day with food.
- Neurotoxic effects have been reported in dialysis patients treated with dialysis fluids containing aluminum.
- There is currently no evidence to support a link between aluminum exposure and the development of breast cancer or Alzheimer‘s disease.
Except in the particular case of dialysis patients, no health concerns should therefore be associated with the use of aluminum.
How has recycling and the secondary aluminum production changed in the past years?
Globally, primary aluminum is still the dominant source of aluminum, but recycling and therefore secondary aluminum production has grown significantly and steadily over the past decades. Secondary aluminum production now represents around one third of the global aluminum production. In certain countries, such as in the U.S. and Japan, it has even surpassed by a large percentage primary aluminum production. Most aluminum goes into long-lasting items such as building and construction and therefore requires many years before it’s available for recycling. However in some areas high-recycling rates (e.g., aluminum cans) and “closed-loop recycling” systems (e.g., automotive industry for car body scraps) are put into place which maximise recycling rates and efficiencies. Secondary recycled aluminum only requires 5% of the energy of primary aluminum and generates equally less CO2. This is the reason that energy costs and environmental awareness by consumers are huge drivers for secondary aluminum production. Aluminum can be endlessly recycled, though special care must be taken to maximise its value. This is why recycling into the same or similar alloys is very important. Sorting and cleaning technologies for scrap have significantly improved in the past years, which now opens many opportunities for the integration of clean scrap into high-tech products without compromising quality and performance.
The Aluminum Association - Secondary ProductionVisit
Is aluminum recyclable (compared to steel)?
Yes, aluminum is just as recyclable as steel. And due to its much lower melting point, it is also much easier to recycle. In the industry we distinguish between industrial (or pre-consumer) recycling and post-consumer recycling. Industrial recycling is often done in so-called “closed loop systems.” For example, an automotive stamping factory will return all scrap directly back to its sheet metal supplier that will then re-melt the scrap, and, with very little loss, put it back into new sheet for that same plant.
Post-consumer scrap is either also directly recycled back into the same or similar products. The best example is a pop can, or vehicle wheels. When these items come back as a scrap mix, they are separated and then recycled using special processes. An extreme example is the non-ferrous remains of a scrapped car that was shredded. It goes through different separation processes that allow materials such as plastics and rubber to be separated from the non-ferrous scrap pieces. Those scrap pieces are then re-melted into a die-casting alloy called A380 that is typically used to cast a wide variety of products, from engine blocks to furniture brackets. Aluminum is endlessly recyclable and does not lose much of its value. It is important to recycle it as much as possible back into the same alloy (or alloy family) in order to conserve the maximum value.
Are exorbitant amounts of electrical energy used to produce aluminum?
On a global average, about 14 MWh (Megawatt hours) are required to produce one ton of aluminum. This seems very high, but the number has been coming down with advancing technologies. In the 1980s this number was over 17 MWh, and in 1990 it dropped to around 16MWh.
The new smelters in China are already quite a bit below this number. China on average is at only 13 MWh per ton of aluminum. The most important factor for the reduction came from replacing Söderberg smelting technology with the “prebake” process to bring the number down to 12-16 MWh/ton of aluminum. Most new smelter technologies around the world are now at about 12 MWh/t of aluminum. Rio Tinto and Alcoa are working on “carbon free” aluminum with their new joint venture (Elysis).
Are the red sludge from alumina production harmful to the environment?
Yes, especially if not treated properly. As the by-product of alumina refining, it has a very high pH content. This is due to the sodium hydroxide solution from the refining process, which can burn and damage airways if fumes are inhaled, or kill animal and plant life if released. Although the environmentally hazardous disposal of the substance in rivers, lakes and oceans has been discontinued, red mud is still typically kept in open reservoirs susceptible to leaks and floods. An example of this was in Hungary where, in October 2010, it escaped killing 10 people and causing environmental damage. When red mud is left to dry in a pond for several years, it becomes buried or mixed with soil, presumably burying the harmful parts along with it. The mud is comprised of particles, such as toxic heavy metals, and may also be slightly radioactive if the original bauxite contained such minerals.
The upside is that more methods to use red mud in an environmentally friendly way are being developed. At the moment there’s only a limited use for it as a pigment in the manufacture of bricks to use one example. While it contains useful elements like caustic sods, iron, titanium and aluminum, there currently isn’t a method to extract these elements that’s economically viable.
Is bauxite mining harmful to the environment?
As with almost all mining activities, there is a direct negative impact on the environment, especially if the mining is done too aggressively or carelessly. For this reason most major aluminum companies work to implement “sustainable mining” initiatives. Among other things, bauxite mining impacts the environment the most through air pollution, as exhaust gases from mining vehicles and heavy machinery and dust particles are produced and spread through various avenues during the process. These are inhaled by miners and nearby communities. Where the coarser pieces can be coughed out and are less of an issue, the fine particles tend to lodge themselves in the lungs (alveoli), which can lead to respiratory and cardiovascular problems. Additionally, heavy metals such as lead and arsenic can be accidentally drained into water sources (especially for drinking), and as they do not degrade, they deposit at the bottom and are taken up by plants and various animals, in which levels are much higher than they should be. The heavy metals may also be mobilized through water, flushed downstream and deposited into clay minerals or absorbed by algae. This accumulates and causes dangerous levels, therefore affecting many organisms. Mining can also lead to soil contamination, as heavy metals cause a decrease in microbiological activity, meaning nutrients are not released into soil, lowering fertility and restricting plant growth. In this case, many habitats are destroyed, soil erosion is facilitated, and vegetables that have grown there may have high levels of heavy metals. Making sure to source aluminium from a responsible company that practices responsible and sustainable mining is therefore very important.
How much carbon emissions are generated by the production of 1 kilogram of aluminum versus steel?
As in many cases, this really depends on where the metal is produced and especially what type of energy was used to produce it. On a global average basis, one kilogram of steel produces 1.83 kg of CO2, while one kilogram of aluminum produces over 12 kg of CO2. Unfortunately, most of the recent capacity expansions have taken place in China, where coal is the dominant energy source used. In the past decades, aluminum production capacity has also increased in the Middle East, where the use of primarily natural gas generates fewer carbon emissions.
Outside of those two regions, aluminum production had been shifting to renewable energy sources (predominantly hydroelectric power, used in 100% of all Canadian aluminum production), until the U.S. began reviving old and obsolete coal-powered smelters. However, both the steel and aluminum industries worldwide are working hard to reduce their carbon footprint, and with the Rio Tinto – Alcoa Joint Venture (Elysis) we seem to be relatively close to making this a reality in the
Is it true that aluminum production has a worse carbon footprint than steel production?
On a global basis, steel is responsible for 7 to 9% of all energy system emissions. The global steel industry therefore contributes 2.8 Gt per annum of CO2, and each ton of steel produces on average 1.83 tons of CO2 (according to the World Steel Association). Primary aluminum production is more energy intensive and its carbon footprint is 4 to 6 times higher than that of steel (on a global average) if calculated per ton of metal. Once each metal is recycled, the carbon footprint in both cases is substantially lower, but in theory it is still higher for aluminum than for steel. It is therefore very important to use each material in the right situation for the right product, so that over the full lifespan (from cradle to grave – or even back to cradle) the carbon footprint is minimized.
For this we need what’s called a “life-cycle analysis.” One example is the transportation industry, which uses a lot of both steel and aluminum and accounts for about 19% of all man-made CO2 emissions. Eighty percent of all greenhouse gas emissions are produced during the operating life (i.e., not the production of a car/bus/truck/etc.), and a 10% weight reduction (by using the right material) can yield fuel economy improvements of 5-7%. For example, reducing the weight of a city bus by 1 kg can save 40-55 kg of CO2. This is a perfect example of why just looking at the initial carbon footprint of a material will not give us the full picture of the best usage for a specific product. That’s why a full life-cycle analysis is needed.
Financial Times - Cleaning up steel is key to tackling climate changeVisit
Energy Transitions CommissionVisit
European Journal of Sustainable DevelopmentVisit
International Aluminium Institute - Aluminium Carbon Footprint Technical Support DocumentVisit
OECD - Greenhouse Gases Emissions From Aluminium ProductionVisit
Does aluminum production generate large quantities of greenhouse gas emissions?
Primary aluminum production is very energy intensive and generates large amounts of direct and indirect emissions. Direct greenhouse gas emissions come primarily from the use of fossil fuels in the alumina calcination process, but also from process-related conditions in electrolysis, such as consumption of carbon anodes (CO2) and PFC emissions (PerFluoroCarbon) from anode effects. The main energy consumption is the electricity used for the electrolysis process in aluminum smelters (causing indirect emissions). But the refining of alumina from bauxite ore also requires a significant amount of energy (to produce the solution of bauxite in caustic soda, for the calcination process and for the recovery of caustic soda after use).
Improving energy efficiency is essential for the aluminum industry, both from an economic and environmental point of view. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from energy use and from the electrolysis processes is therefore important to reducing the overall carbon footprint of primary aluminum. The aluminum industry has been working on this with significant success over the past century.
Countries like Canada, Iceland and Norway use hydroelectric power, a renewable energy source, to produce aluminum. Recycled aluminum only requires 5% of the energy and generates therefore only a very small fraction of the greenhouse gases that primary aluminum does. Using aluminum made from renewable energy and with the highest possible recycled content guarantees the smallest carbon footprint and lowest greenhouse gases possible.1
Is aluminum more damaging to the environment than steel?
The answer depends on the application and what type of aluminum or steel you are comparing. Primary aluminum production is very energy intensive—the carbon footprint worldwide is estimated to be between 8 and 12 tons of CO2 per ton of aluminum (depending how it is calculated and who you ask). Steel’s carbon footprint is only about 2 tons of CO2 for 1 ton of steel. However, depending on where the aluminum was made and with which energy source, aluminum’s carbon footprint can be much lower. For example, in Canada, primary aluminum’s carbon footprint is only 2.5 tons of CO2 per ton of aluminum. Steel is also 3 times heavier than aluminum, which makes comparing “per ton” an unbalanced comparison.
Aluminum is extremely durable and easily recyclable. Recycled aluminum’s carbon footprint is only 5% of that of primary aluminum. Aluminum is used because it is lightweight and has a high strength-to-weight ratio. In many products—especially in the transportation industry—it helps save a significant amount of CO2 emissions during the use phase of the vehicle. So to accurately compare the environmental impact of materials,
a full “life-cycle analysis” needs to be done.
Does aluminum contribute to or help mitigate the effects of climate change?
Primary aluminum production is very energy intensive and can have negative impacts on the environment and climate. But, when put to use, aluminum can have very positive impacts on climate change because of its properties:1
In the transportation industry, aluminum’s light weight increases efficiency and reduces fuel consumption and emissions.2
Durable and corrosion-resistant
Aluminum can last much longer than other materials without any protective finishing. In fact, 75% of all aluminum ever produced is still in use, so its true environmental impact can only be calculated at its true end of life (and through a full life cycle analysis).3
Easily recyclable with a high scrap value
The aluminum content in certain products (like cars) encourages higher recycling rates.3 Creating new materials from recycled aluminum only requires 5% of the energy needed to produce primary aluminum. It’s relatively easy to recycle and has a very high scrap value.
Aluminum offers designers infinite possibilities for optimizing their products, both in terms of shape and properties (for example, architects can leverage aluminum’s high reflectivity to keep a building from heating up in the sunlight).
Is aluminum production harmful to the environment?
First we need to distinguish between primary and secondary aluminum production. Secondary aluminum production from recycled aluminum only uses about 5% of the energy (and hence only produces about 5% of CO2) of primary aluminum. Secondary aluminum is therefore always less harmful for the environment. However special attention must be paid to the recycling process and to possible emissions by using special filters and so on.
Primary aluminum production is the globally dominant source of aluminum and contributes the most to the huge energy consumption and carbon footprint of aluminum overall1. It takes about 4 tons of bauxite to make 2 tons of alumina, which can be smelted into 1 ton of aluminum. The most dangerous environmental threat of bauxite mining is so-called “red mud” generation combined with the energy consumed to extract it from the earth and transport it to the refinery. Alumina production is energy intensive and depending on the source of the energy the environmental impact can be very different2. Most energy consumption and CO2 generation happens in the electrolysis process where alumina is smelted into aluminum. Several other emissions are also generated at this stage3,4. It is therefore important to do a full life-cycle assessment to assess the true impact of the aluminum used in a specific application. The higher the recycling content, the better it will usually be. Technological advancements, especially in the smelting technologies, are significantly reducing the energy consumption and might even bring us “carbon free” aluminum in the future5.
iea - Direct CO2 intensity of aluminium production, 2000-2018Visit
USGS - The Global Flow of Aluminum From 2006 Through 2025Visit
International Aluminium Institute - Aluminium Carbon Footprint Technical Support DocumentVisit
Apple paves the way for breakthrough carbon-free aluminum smelting methodVisit
How has aluminum production changed compared to past years?
The main change over the past years and decades has been in the global primary production volume, that has constantly gone up from less than 30,000 tons about 15 years ago in 2014 to almost 65,000 tons in 2018 in the regions where it is produced.
In 1990 China produced only 5% of the global aluminum. Since 2014 Chinese production has represented more than 50% of the global production, while Europe, Africa, North and South America have not seen any significant growth in production volume in the same timeframe. Other than China most of the growth in production took place in the Middle East, and other Asian countries. With innovations in aluminum smelting technologies the energy required for production has been consistently declining. This has happened in China more than the rest of the world as most of the new smelters have been built there. In North America until the recent re-starts of old and idled U.S. smelters the hydro power share has been rising. Unfortunately coal has become the dominant source of energy, as most of the Chinese smelters use this as their energy source.
International Aluminum InstituteVisit